The evidence showed that there was no reason to suspect fraud via the slight donee or connivance with income officials. Onus of Evidence: The court emphasized which the onus to demonstrate the genuineness in the gift was upon the beneficiary (plaintiff). Once the reward was denied, this concern could only https://dantetgxwk.blogdeazar.com/31318304/5-essential-elements-for-easements-and-rights-of-way-advocate-in-karachi